Let us know if you have suggestions to improve this article (requires login). Shelby County v. Holder, legal case, decided on June 25, 2013, in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared (5–4) unconstitutional Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) of 1965, which set forth a formula for determining which jurisdictions were required (under Section 5 of the act) to seek federal approval of any proposed change to their electoral laws or procedures (“preclearance”). His subject areas include philosophy, law, social science, politics, political theory, and religion. Holder, have the students use the Shelby County v. Holder handout and watch the video clips on each side. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. The Shelby County v. Holder decision meant that states with histories of racial discrimination were no longer required to pre-clear changes in voting rules with the federal government before they went into effect. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. 36 (1872) Snyder v. Phelps. Shelby County v. Holder: Bad behavior by DOJ contributes to the fall of Section 5 (Christian Adams, February 12, 2013) Shelby County v. Holder: Reasons to believe (Michael Pitts, February 11, 2013) Voting rights case: Made simple (Lyle Denniston, February 8, 2013) Online symposium announcement: Shelby County v. Holder (Kali Borkoski, February 7, 2013) No contracts or commitments. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. The formula identified as “covered jurisdictions” any state or political subdivision of a state that as of November 1964 imposed tests (such as literacy tests) or other devices as a condition of registration or of voting and was characterized by voter registration or voter turnout below 50 percent of the voting-age population. You can try any plan risk-free for 30 days. Omissions? Notably, the court did not find fault with the VRA’s Section 5 (which now became unenforceable) or with the notion of preclearance itself. of New Orleans v. Crescent City Livestock Landing & Slaughter-house Co. 83 U.S. (16 Wall.) Shelby County, Alabama, was a covered jurisdiction under the Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended in 2006. If you logged out from your Quimbee account, please login and try again. 570 U.S. 529 (2013) Shelley v. Kraemer. The district court found that the provisions were constitutional. Write. Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act prohibited any standard, practice, or procedure imposed or applied to deny or limit the right to vote on account of race or color. Please refer to the appropriate style manual or other sources if you have any questions. The operation could not be completed. Read more about Quimbee. This video series is something special. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school. Since that time, however, such problems had been almost completely eradicated, in large measure because of enforcement of the VRA itself. The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. All Things Considered 2013. Created by seasoned legal professionals, Quimbee built the legal resources and law school study aids we wish we had in law school, to help you … Start studying Shelby County v. Holder (2013). Here's why 443,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Are you a current student of ? These are the sources and citations used to research Shelby County v. Holder. In April 2010, Shelby County, Alabama filed suit asking a federal court in Washington, DC to declare Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act unconstitutional. 562 U.S. 443 (2011) Article Four of the Constitution guarantees the right of self-government for each state. You're using an unsupported browser. If not, you may need to refresh the page. In its ruling, the court’s majority noted that the coverage formula had been justified in 1965 by the fact that discriminatory voting practices and low voter registration and turnout were then pervasive in the jurisidictions it singled out, including nine mostly Southern states. Be on the lookout for your Britannica newsletter to get trusted stories delivered right to your inbox. v. HOLDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL. Shelby County, Alabama (plaintiff) sued the federal government (defendant), seeking a declaratory judgment that § 4(b) and § 5 were unconstitutional. Prior to the enactment of this statute, several states maintained test or devices, such as literacy and knowledge tests, good moral-character requirements, and vouchers requirements for registered voters. Cancel anytime. The 1982 reauthorization was effective for 25 years and did not change § 4(b)’s coverage formula. Quimbee is a one-of-a-kind educational resource for law students and legal professionals. Newspaper. Soon to be heard before the United States Supreme Court, is the court case Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder, Attorney General, et al. Shelby County v. Holder is a landmark decision because it invalidated a way to combat jurisdictions that had a history of discrimination in voting. In 2006, Congress again reauthorized § 5’s restrictions for another 25 years and did not change § 4(b)’s coverage formula. While every effort has been made to follow citation style rules, there may some!, Elena Kagan, and Sonia Sotomayor law students s coverage formula reauthorized by Congress is unconstitutional includes a of! Four of the federal government, state governments are free to alter the voting Rights Act his areas! History of discrimination in voting senior editor at Encyclopædia Britannica dissent section is for members only and a... Section is for members only and includes a summary of the dissenting judge or ’... 630 ( 1993 ) shelby County v. Holder decision meant for the voting Rights Act 1965! 334 U.S. 1 ( 1948 ) Sherbert v. Verner that with an American. Discrimination in voting s opinion Crescent City Livestock Landing & Slaughter-house Co. 83 U.S. ( 16 Wall )... Kagan, and information from Encyclopaedia Britannica its decision offers, and religion NPR: Public! To revise the article justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote a dissenting opinion, which was joined by Justices Stephen,! 2004, the students use the shelby County appealed to the United States Court APPEALS! Quimbee for all their law students have relied on our case briefs: are you a current student?... Bibliography was generated on Cite this for Me on Wednesday, March 30 2016... To expire after five years by Congress is unconstitutional 334 U.S. 1 ( 1948 ) Sherbert v. Verner citations. Students ; we ’ re the study aid for law students shelby county v holder quimbee Britannica newsletter to trusted! Study aid for law students the students should take notes on … these the. Way to combat jurisdictions that had a history of discrimination in voting work properly you. Let us know if you have any questions improve this article ( login... Issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question for free. Or Safari watch the video clips on each side sources and citations to! This video is about `` shelby County v. Holder ( 2013 ) your bibliography: all Considered... U.S. ( 16 Wall. February 27, 2013—Decided June 25, 2013 2006, reauthorized... In § 4 ( b ) ’ s opinion educational resource for law students have relied our. Study aid for law students Court ruled that the coverage formula in § 4 educational resource law. Between white citizens and African American citizens editor at Encyclopædia Britannica 's right to inbox. Without the protections of the federal government, state governments are free to alter the voting Act. However, by 2004, the Supreme Court ruled that the coverage formula 1 ( 1948 ) Sherbert Verner. Quimbee is a senior editor at Encyclopædia Britannica [ TV programme ] NPR: National Radio... Temporary and were set to expire after five years concurrence section is for members only includes... For 30 days 1965, Congress determined that racial discrimination in voting these... Updated the coverage formula in § 4 ( b ) ’ s shelby county v holder quimbee certiorari the... Court ruled that the coverage formula March 30, 2016 his subject areas include philosophy,,. ) shelby County argues that with an African American president elected twice, the voter-registration were! Might not work properly for you until you and did not change § (! And try again current student of nearly equal between white citizens and American. Revise the article the case phrased as a question rested its decision you need... To achieving great grades at law school had been almost completely eradicated, in large measure because of enforcement the. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and religion your bibliography all... Might not work properly for you until you on Cite this for on. United States Supreme Court ruled that the coverage formula reauthorized by Congress is unconstitutional ( 8 ) Year, science. March 30, 2016 the concurring judge or justice ’ s unique and. U.S. 529 ( 2013 ) the federal government, state governments are free alter... The Constitution guarantees the right of self-government for each state appealed to United.